Regina

136 user reviews

4.6

/10
Average votes grouped by age and by sex:
Age: 1-12 13-17 18-25 26-35 36-49 50+ Total
Men:
Votes:
9.5
2
5.8
11
5.2
18
3.2
18
4
26
3.6
14
4.3
89
Women:
Votes:
2
1
5.5
2
5.6
5
3.8
6
5.3
16
2.8
6
4.6
36
Total:
Votes:
7.7
4
5.8
13
5.4
25
3.6
26
4.5
47
3.3
20
4.6
136
Total includes those who didn't specify sex.

Write your comment and vote!

Reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 136)


Filter reviews

Like watching the first Ghost Rider, but while wearing goggles made of [...] ... I felt myself slowly going cray it was so bad, and not the kind of bad you go see to make fun of. This movie makes "The Zoo Keeper" look like "Inception".

1/10
markbrowne21@ - first review
10.5.2012 - age: 18-25


Was very sad about this one. It was okay-iah. Felt like Cage was not there so to speak.

7/10
shazjoao@ - 1435 reviews
4.5.2012


Nicolas Cage can't seem to do a great movie nowadays. This movie isn't what it should be. I feel like they stretched out the character to suit Nicolas Cage's more erratic acting at times. They made ghost rider more personable which I think is a mistake. The story is not great but not the worst it could be. Overall the movie just missed the mark.

4/10
sacoca_@ - 597 reviews
26.4.2012 - age: 26-35


It was an ok movie. The 1st ghost rider was better. Not sure if I would see it again unless it was free on tv.

6/10
mayson7@ - 10 reviews
18.4.2012 - age: 36-49


When Stan Lee doesn't make a cameo, you have to rely on funding from Abu Dhabi and you shoot in Turkey and Romania, you know there might be a problem with your movie. A steaming pile, even steamier than the first if that's possible. Cage is horribly miscast and his attempts to add character to the character come off as weak and sad. The story is about as predictable and cliched as you can imagine. The villain was okay and some of the camera shots were nice but otherwise, be prepared to lose a portion of your life that you could have spent doing something better with your time, watching reruns of Charles in Charge or counting the hairs in your eyebrow come to mind as far more enjoyable than watching this garbage.

4/10
parker_2@ - 251 reviews
12.4.2012 - age: 36-49


It was not much of action movie nor as ghost rider movie. The story was not that great, it went a little too fast, some of the characters were missing, elements of the first movie was not followed. It was all too fast motioned and not much thrilling. It was a waste of time and money.

3/10
sherhan11@ - 6 reviews
12.4.2012 - age: 13-17


Worst movie I've seen in a long time... no story... no content... no acting... even from Nic Cage... I love all the Marvel movies except this one... Don't waste your time and money.

2/10
emualliug1@ - first review
10.4.2012 - age: 26-35


I was expecting something else, I got Nicolas Cage acting as a cobra for Ghost Rider, LMAOF... I felt sorry for him and his bad acting to get a legendary comic hero... I wish it wasn't all about the awesome images on 3D coz that is good of the film but they are destroying Ghost Rider Story.

2/10
jaguar-soul@ - 13 reviews
30.3.2012 - age: 26-35


I'm so disappointed! Not worth paying to see in theater and 3d effect is so bad. Wonder why they make a 2nd movie.

3/10
monicafia@ - 124 reviews
29.3.2012 - age: 26-35


Who knew they could still make major release movies this bad. No plot, laughable effects, poor direction, no humour... nothing redeemable whatsoever. Not even worth a DVD rental.

1/10
ekkobeach@ - first review
24.3.2012 - age: 36-49


Total disappointment, I enjoyed the first Ghost Rider so much. This movie looks nothing like the original, the visual was terrible, and the dialogue was forced and extremely dry. Stay away at all costs.

1/10
michaeldlunney@ - first review
24.3.2012 - age: 36-49


Very very very bad. The first one was reasonable, watchable. This one... first time in a long time I've walked out of a movie...

2/10
katmanking@ - 7 reviews
15.3.2012 - age: 26-35


Nicholas, shame, shame, shame on you! You are much better than that, behave that way.

1/10
bestafter55@ - first review
15.3.2012 - age: 50+


Bad acting for Nic, empty scenes, poor monologue and are you kidding storyline. Nic is one of my favs but... save your money.

3/10
jsunme1@ - first review
10.3.2012 - age: 50+


Better than the first one which was awesome too.

10/10
joannabrandl@ - first review
10.3.2012 - age: 36-49


Better than the first one which was awesome too.

10/10
joannabrandl@ - first review
10.3.2012 - age: 36-49


I have always been a fan of the Marvel Superhero films and I didn't mind the first Ghost Rider at all. I would say it was done fairly well. However, the sequal was a major disapointment. Johnny Blaze (Nicholas Cage's character) came off as really sick and twisted (which was both humourus at parts and also disturbing) What got me was that that it wasn't the same directors from the first film, Peter Fonda did not return to fulfill his role as the Devil, and Eva Mendes was a much better love interest than this new chick. In order to sum it up, I went to see it with my two friends, one had a headache like me after the film and the other was asleep for most of it. Also, DO NOT SEE IN 3D!!! We made that mistake...

3/10
budsfan_009@ - first review
9.3.2012 - age: 13-17


Wow! That is 2 hours of my life I will never get back. What a waste.

1/10
lf55@ - first review
9.3.2012 - age: 50+


I was so disappointed by Nicolas Cage.

1/10
tiffanyyang1018@ - first review
9.3.2012 - age: 18-25


Mailed it in. Did not tie in with original- very weak effort. I love Nick Cage and left after 20 minutes!

2/10
david@ - first review
9.3.2012 - age: 36-49


Wow anyone that thought this was better than the 1st one... are you kidding me? This one was very disappointing... I was lookin sooo forward to it... acting was bad... CAGE was on crack... lol... but seriously thet really dropped the ball on this sequel... too bad... this movie was pretty much bad all around.

3/10
spankster_691@ - 9 reviews
7.3.2012 - age: 36-49


Action packed awesome. With a little bit of weirdness.

8/10
mak1996@ - 2 reviews
6.3.2012 - age: 13-17


Wow that was bad. I mean really bad. I loved the first movie and was excited to see this one. They didn't keep to the first movie, changed just about everything they could and the way the movie was "shot" was poor at best. Really terrible from start to finish.

1/10
johnsmith@ - first review
6.3.2012 - age: 26-35


This movie is the worst movie I have ever seen!

1/10
mtyoussef@ - first review
5.3.2012 - age: 13-17


Worst marvel movie ever! This movie smells. Don't go. Stay home.

1/10
shandow99_@ - first review
5.3.2012 - age: 18-25


Very slow, less violence than the first. Thought it was very boring. I have seen better Marvel movies, this one was really bad. Only good part was the flamethrower part when it was kinda funny but overall the movie was very poor. Wait till it's on tv, don't see it in theaters.

3/10
jordanmahdi@ - 20 reviews
5.3.2012 - age: 13-17


I took my husband to see this movie as his first experience with a 3D movie. I was very disappointed in the whole experience. He was not impressed with the 3D effects, as well as I was very disappointed in the story line of the movie. I enjoyed the 1st movie more and the story did not flow through to the sequel. They could have done soo much more with this movie and failed miserably.

1/10
jrock@ - first review
4.3.2012 - age: 26-35


One word sums up this latest piece of hollywood trash - lame...

1/10
johnnyo@ - first review
4.3.2012 - age: 36-49


This movie sucked balls, one of the worst movies I have ever seen, please don't waste your money.

1/10
familyguy_com@ - first review
4.3.2012 - age: 26-35


Don't waste your money. Very boooring!

4/10
raphaeldominique@ - 3 reviews
3.3.2012 - age: 36-49


Nicolas is the best. I love his acting and would suggest this movie to anyone.

10/10
victorio@ - 2 reviews
1.3.2012 - age: 18-25


The special effects were not as good as the first movie. The story line did not continue from the first movie, as the first movie Nicolas Cage had decided not to give back his powers to the devil so that he could take on the curse of the rider and use his powers to concur evil as he sees fit and he did not take orders from the devil. Peter Fonda should have re-casted as the devil. This movie had to many inconsistencies with the original movie ie: the death stair "look into my eyes" to his bike and even the look of burning jacket and skull which was different from the original character. I feel that Nicolas Cage had less dialogue both as the Ghost Rider and as Johnny Blaze. This was the worst sequel I have seen to date and I was really looking forward to this movie. Not even worth a rental.

2/10
dr_taillon@ - 3 reviews
29.2.2012 - age: 36-49


I can understand some of the negative reviews due to the story not being as clear cut and easy to understand all at once, but I loved it anyways. There is a good story to it, just not totally linked to the first. Left me with a good feeling of justice prevailing and thought it was time well spent.

8/10
castonguay.sophie@ - 2 reviews
29.2.2012 - age: 36-49


Good movie. Better than the first one. But could do with more explanation about the history of the characters. Preview gave the impression that a better movie was to be had. Could have made villains harder to defeat too.

7/10
dm12djm@ - first review
28.2.2012 - age: 36-49


This movie is so much better than the first! Great storyline, amazing camera work and higher quality effects. I definitely recommend this movie!

8/10
amanda.elena@ - 6 reviews
28.2.2012 - age: 18-25


The first one was a great movie. This one does not even come close to what was the first movie. I see lots of movies and this one is the worst I saw in a long time.

3/10
martc1977@ - 8 reviews
28.2.2012 - age: 26-35


[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
Off course from the first film, Johnny Blaze is still haunted with his demon, he attempts to find the truth to his faith by living for a better good. Given details of an evil he must destroy, but he did not expect it to be hidden in a young boy. Though many will toss stones at this new addition, all I can say is [...]. A generation of spoiled fruit, who stare in disbelief, comparing every detail. GHOST RIDER 2, had it been developed in the 1980's, our eyes would soak up this awesome new addition to this era of MARVEL franchise comic films.

7/10
perfectedpicture@ - 12 reviews
27.2.2012 - age: 18-25


Unfortunate. The fire effects of the Rider were the only redeeming quality to this destruction of a not entirely awful plot. Good example of seducing the investors into production of a film that needed significantly more planning and storyline development. If you enjoyed the first one, let that be the memory of the Ghostrider you hold onto; this one was sort of a wimpy barbecue briquette of a 'protagonist'.

4/10
thecore@ - first review
26.2.2012 - age: 36-49


I watched GR with my daughter of 11 years and we both thought it was worth seeing once. I won't spend the money on it, if you are thinking of watching it... we got in with my free movies deal. However, it was a bit silly at times and you are left wondering what happened with why there were so many changes from the first GR. I like the first GR much more than this one. Sooo, choose wisely... to ghost or not to ghost? That is the question.

6/10
wapistan@ - 3 reviews
26.2.2012 - age: 36-49


It was entertaining, also the way it was payed out it was really good, but it was more of a movie for 6-15 year olds, but if u have seen the Matrix it was almost as good as it way better than the first, some may dislike because of who it was actually intended for really was an action packed film. If you seen the first movie and disliked like me, well then u know the writer made it a lot better, go see if a kid or teen or if like the Matrix.

8/10
bradly.glover@ - first review
26.2.2012 - age: 36-49


I went with my son, and we both wanted to leave before it was over, really bad.

1/10
movielover@ - first review
26.2.2012 - age: 36-49


This movie should be called "toast rider". Nuff said.

3/10
nmrzvn@ - first review
26.2.2012 - age: 26-35


Zzz. Slept through it. Nicolas Cage changed from thin to heavy in the blink of an eye, and that shapeshifting did nothing to save the movie.

2/10
marji1919@ - 2 reviews
25.2.2012 - age: 50+


If you like grindhouse movies or people shooting rocket launchers this is your movie. Other than that you will hate it lol. The rider moments are alone worth seeing, most think Cage's acting is "bad" but that's Cage love him or hate him :)

7/10
s.k.walsh@ - first review
25.2.2012 - age: 18-25


Bad and bad and worst the bad. This movie is a complete failure.

1/10
levirtuose@ - first review
25.2.2012 - age: 26-35


Note: The user reviews posted on this page are personal opinions of our visitors. We are not responsible for their content.

Click to see more reviews:
[1-50]  [51-100]   [101-136]  

Did you see ''Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance''?

Write a movie review and you could WIN free tickets!!! (details about the promotion)

How do you rate this movie?


Please explain. Write your comment here:


Your age:     Male:   Female: (optional)

Your e-mail:

You will receive a confirmation of your comment by e-mail.
We reserve the right to reject your comment at our discretion.

Mobile · Home · Top 10 · Trailers · Playing · Upcoming · Theatres · Movies · DVD · Promotions · Change City · USA · Contact Us · Français
Terms and Privacy Policy under which this service is provided to you.
© 1996-2012 CinemaClock Canada Inc.