Brandon

205 user reviews

6.2

/10
Average votes grouped by age and by sex:
Age: 1-12 13-17 18-25 26-35 36-49 50+ Total
Men:
Votes:
-
0
7.7
6
7.8
17
6.8
29
5.6
35
5
31
6.2
118
Women:
Votes:
9.5
2
9
2
5.8
13
6.7
8
5.9
27
6
22
6.2
75
Total:
Votes:
9.5
2
8
8
7
31
6.8
38
5.7
66
5.5
55
6.2
205
Total includes those who didn't specify sex.

Write your comment and vote!

Reviews from 1 to 50 (total: 205)


Filter reviews

Bad movie from the start to the end, not worthy at all... I saw this at home and I was trying hard not to shut it off, saw it just coz I had my computer near to lose time while it ended and saw the hole thing before saying it's boring, bad and lame.

2/10
jaguar-soul@ - 13 reviews
14.5.2012 - age: 26-35


Probably a 6.5, but meh. Not a bad flick, but some out to lunch scenes that just didn't make sense. There was one part where they had to cross an obstacle, and it was pretty impressive, to get away from the wolves. What transpires is just foolish. I mean, how did the wolves figure that situation out. Lots of that kinda stuff. The whole time you're asking yourself, come on! Liam was pretty bang on though, and the scenery was kinda epic. Not a bad movie, not a great movie.

6/10
rob_ontario18@ - 64 reviews
10.5.2012 - age: 26-35


Very unrealistic movie. No attempt by survivors to survive other than walking into the unknown wilderness. The basics of bushcraft escaped them. Was disgusted and knew they would all die one by one.

4/10
lynxear@ - 2 reviews
5.5.2012 - age: 50+


A crew of oilfield workers survive a plane wreck only to be in the middle of the arctic surrounded by wolves. My interpretation, purgatory at its best, the devil dogs close behind, awaiting another soul. Though maybe each survivor can make up for their past mistakes by honoring one another with compassion, or lack their of, and define their true colors resulting in eternal judgement delivered by merciless demon hounds.

8/10
photosundown@ - 12 reviews
2.5.2012 - age: 26-35


Suspense was there but I kinda knew where it was going too. Glad I rented it instead.

6/10
shazjoao@ - 1435 reviews
9.4.2012


Note a very noteworthy nor memorable film. Stereotype characters with thin plot line. Watching Neeson is the only redeeming feature.

5/10
sigalius@ - 2 reviews
2.4.2012 - age: 50+


Gives wolves bad PR, like Disney did with The Big Bad Wolf.

6/10
garyglobal@ - 4 reviews
20.3.2012 - age: 50+


Good action movie. Realistic in a lot of ways. The scenery alone is worth the money. Liam Neeson does a great job in this film. Very touching ending.

7/10
orkelly@ - 79 reviews
18.3.2012 - age: 50+


I normally don't like these survivor-type movies (too grim for my liking), but this one had me on the edge of my seat, mouth gaping. Liam Neeson, as always, very good.

9/10
spoodles7@ - 15 reviews
14.3.2012 - age: 36-49


There is plenty of suspense but a few instances where The Girl Guide Handbook would have really helped these guys out (how to dress a wound, how to protect yourself from a snowstorm in a very snowy area, etc.) Because of that, you can't give this film a higher rating. Also, if you go see it, stay until AFTER the credits roll. Most of the audience left during the credits and didn't see a final shot, shown after the credits rolled, that changes the ending of the story! There is NO indication during the rolling of the credits that something else is coming. I read about the ending on-line after seeing the film; I missed it at the cinema :(

6/10
damedenise@ - 10 reviews
14.3.2012 - age: 50+


I thought the movie was pretty good. A lot of people didn't like the ending but it fit perfectly to the theme of the movie. I didn't really care for the graphics on the wolf scenes though. I think they could have done a better job with that.

7/10
gman129@ - 19 reviews
7.3.2012 - age: 26-35


Not a very well done movie, I love surviver movies, and this 1 bites when you remember how much time and money you wasted seeing it. Wolves don't eat people or hunt them, domestic dogs are by far more dangerous with 100s of reported attacks every year. With less than 10 reports of wolf attacks in over 100 years why would anyone think this film's story line is remotely plausible. Too bad this story lacks imagination, the setting's great with good actors.

5/10
james@ - 3 reviews
3.3.2012 - age: 26-35


This movie is a masterpiece, definitely gonna be one of the best movies of all time. If you read any dislike comments, that's because they are young; this movie is not meant for kids. Only 17 and over; unless you are "Grown Up" for your age. Such a heart-felt movie, while dealing with the most ridiculous situation. MUST WATCH.

9/10
zylex@ - first review
3.3.2012 - age: 18-25


Boring not worth admission. To predictable, please Liam don't waste a great talent.

5/10
gaburt@ - first review
1.3.2012 - age: 50+


Ridiculous. Slow. Sensational. Bad acting.

2/10
jaime@ - 2 reviews
1.3.2012 - age: 36-49


More BS about wolves. Worst movie I have ever seen.

1/10
crazyhorse44@ - first review
29.2.2012 - age: 50+


This movie was terrible! It was extremely depressing, had no plot and no redemption - not for the characters and not for the movie. Too bad about Liam Neeson being in it, cause I thnk he's a pretty good actor...

2/10
kayelle123@ - 7 reviews
25.2.2012 - age: 36-49


I like Liam Neeson but he must have been hard up for cash to make this movie... I could almost predict who was going to be eaten next... the sound was poor too! Very hard to hear what they were saying... very disappointed in the movie as a whole... and the ending sucked.

5/10
rickbi@ - first review
25.2.2012 - age: 50+


[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
This is the first film in a long time that portrayed a true human drama. The men start out raw and base, then find their individual humanity through suffering. One may benefit from reading "Man's Search for Meaning" by Viktor Frankl prior to viewing the film. If you saw the film and did not like the ending because it did not play out the final conflict, then you went to the wrong film. The ending was perfect. Go see Star Wars next time.

10/10
j.lewis.hoffman@ - first review
25.2.2012 - age: 50+


It's a very good movie, and exciting to watch.

8/10
bernilgilbert@ - first review
24.2.2012 - age: 26-35


Amazing movie, a good nail bitter! I recommend it to everyone! A must see.

9/10
adam_weinstein@ - first review
24.2.2012 - age: 18-25


[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
The plot was far from the truth as far a the behaviour of wolves - but I knew this before going and Liam Neeson said so in an interview "These are MOVIE wolves" he said. Some parts are too far fetched - survivors jumping a 30' ravine as the wolves are on their trail behind them only to find another pack of wolves waiting at the base of the tree that they just jumped over the gorge to - must have been wolves with telepathy knowing that the survivors would be across the revine? The cinematography is excellent - Liam Leeson is good - a good story to watch if you can put your knowledge of wolves away for 2 hours.

7/10
doc_bard@ - first review
24.2.2012 - age: 50+


[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
Liam Neeson is the only survivor of a weekend in the woods. It is the worst story of survival I have ever seen. The characters are cardboard and the drama is false. I was actually cheering for the wolves so this movie could end. Everything and I sincerely mean everything that this movie did was the wrong choice. Stupid and wrong. Next time, they should make a realistic movie.

4/10
donovan.bd@ - first review
23.2.2012 - age: 36-49


Great movie, I loved the suspense and the survival story in it. I definitely wouldn't recommend it for young kids though. I found it a gripping story about how the ruthless side of nature can test you. But in this movie it tests the audience as well as the characters. I thought the wolves were a bit exaggerated in how territorial they were. I loved the plot and thought Neeson gave a gripping performance, possibly the best I've ever seen him give. [...]

7/10
kclos90@ - 10 reviews
22.2.2012 - age: 18-25


It's a masterpeice because, because, I can't really explain it, because it's an awesome movie. So please go watch it!!! Peace Out!

10/10
kaity987@ - first review
21.2.2012 - age: 1-12


Gory movie, I love Liam Neeson and believe he did a fantastic performance. Everyone to their own! I believe this is a must see, though Wolves are not the creatures they portray them out to be in this movie.

8/10
amandaloriedemarcke@ - 2 reviews
20.2.2012 - age: 18-25


It was just the most disgusting movie ever! Don't waste your money. I felt nauseous after this movie. The ending is horrible too.

1/10
silenthousehater@ - 3 reviews
20.2.2012 - age: 18-25


Slow moving, and the ending was a let down.

5/10
20t@ - 2 reviews
19.2.2012 - age: 36-49


The movie takes wolves and turns them into man eating monsters when in real life they would never ever stalk humans unless there was no food left in the world. Ya it saws rogue pack of wolves but an entire pack never be rogue, it's hard enough to find any rogue animal as it is.

1/10
bergman98@ - 2 reviews
19.2.2012 - age: 13-17


No action movie. Plot is invisible, ending is incomplete. Save your $$$, and don't see it. In fact, don't waste your $$$ on renting it either!

4/10
chevy@ - 3 reviews
18.2.2012 - age: 50+


Ending wasn't the greatest... Although the acting was excellent... good storyline as well... Just wished it would've ended better!

6/10
kruschinskec@ - first review
18.2.2012 - age: 18-25


If this is supposed to be a realistic, could happen show - someone didn't research wolves very well. Shows like this are why wolves are becoming an endangered species.

5/10
smlagace@ - first review
18.2.2012 - age: 50+


I enjoyed this movie. Many who disagree I don't think really understand the point, which was all in the poem.

8/10
movielover@ - first review
18.2.2012 - age: 36-49


If you're thinking this is an action flick, you'd be wrong - sort of. The movie is actually surprisingly philosophical, which seems to be its main interest. The terrible jeopardy the characters of the movie are in seem meant simply to exaggerate the philosphical elements of the film. Questions about purpose of life, meeting death, the existence of God, moral values, etc. get a rough and rather superficial treatment through the events of the movie. The lame, shallow, and excessively foul-mouthed reasoning offered by the characters is about what you'd expect from a bunch of "rig pigs." I appreciate the attempt to dig deeper into the important question of life, but the results of doing so in this film are predictably pathetic. And the final, bitter irony at the end of the film just left me shaking my head at the message of utter futility and useless desperation purveyed by it. There are much better stories to engage your mind. Go see them instead!

4/10
nwaikikai@ - 32 reviews
18.2.2012 - age: 36-49


This is quite possibly the best film of the year. I have never seen a film more tense and powerful. Great actors, great scenes, and some of the most heart wrenching deaths I've ever seen.

10/10
tekkdm@ - first review
15.2.2012 - age: 18-25


Good movie 7/10 People don't like the ending. All I have to say is, wait until the credits are over, there's an extra short scene at the end :)

7/10
lord_chuck@ - first review
15.2.2012 - age: 26-35


Don't waste your time, folks!!!

2/10
sdf24@ - first review
14.2.2012 - age: 36-49


This movie is terrible. It is totally unrealistic and not worth your time. Besides the plot being ridiculous the special effects were simply not special. Save your money!!

2/10
jessie@ - first review
14.2.2012 - age: 50+


Unrealistic. Wolves looked mechanical. Plot had big holes in it that did not make sense. Liam is a great actor but this movie was just poorly written or something.

3/10
tantrababe1@ - 3 reviews
14.2.2012 - age: 36-49


Good basis as far as story goes but not developped for movie goers... definitely B rate movie... Liam Neeson is a great actor in a beginner's role as far as actors go... disappointing.

5/10
jo-ray1@ - 2 reviews
14.2.2012 - age: 50+


Hard to rate. A lot of the attack/crash scenes were blurred and unclear. Some ridiculousness as far as escapability and fight. That being said, the movie showed desperation from a number of perspectives and possibly gave each member of the audience someone to relate to. Each character had their own reasons for their behaviour, likely referring to the "grey". In the end, the audience was left to make their own conclusions and even choose for themselves their ending of choice. Tragic and depressing at times, but overall it made you think how you would act and what you would do in a situation like that. I was glad I went and was not disappointed.

7/10
dmesau@ - 9 reviews
14.2.2012 - age: 36-49


[ATTENTION: This review reveals content of the movie.]
What a stinker!!! The plot was put together as sloppily fast as if the writers were being chased by these super-wolves. Wow; I mean what wolf is going to walk inches from fire to attack a human. Furthermore, why didn't the survivors even light the wolves on fire with all that jet fuel they so conveniently carried around with that thermos. Anyway... This movie stunk.

2/10
kewball55@ - first review
13.2.2012 - age: 26-35


Note: The user reviews posted on this page are personal opinions of our visitors. We are not responsible for their content.

Click to see more reviews:
[1-50]  [51-100]   [101-150]   [151-200]   [201-205]  

Did you see ''The Grey''?

Write a movie review and you could WIN free tickets!!! (details about the promotion)

How do you rate this movie?


Please explain. Write your comment here:


Your age:     Male:   Female: (optional)

Your e-mail:

You will receive a confirmation of your comment by e-mail.
We reserve the right to reject your comment at our discretion.

Mobile · Home · Top 10 · Trailers · Playing · Upcoming · Theatres · Movies · DVD · Promotions · Change City · USA · Contact Us · Français
Terms and Privacy Policy under which this service is provided to you.
© 1996-2012 CinemaClock Canada Inc.